1972 (10) TMI 132 - SC - Indian Laws

Supreme Court Upholds Detention Order Under Internal Security Act, 1971

ABDUL AZIZ Versus THE DISTT. MAGISTRATE BURDWAN & ORS.

The Supreme Court upheld the detention order under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971, emphasizing the impact of the petitioner's actions on ... - Issues:1. Validity of detention under Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971.2. Impact of murder incidents on public order.3. Detention order during pendency of prosecution.4. Delay in considering petitioner's representation.5. Interpretation of 'internal security' and 'public order' under the Act.Analysis:1. The petitioner challenged the detention order under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971. The order was passed by the District Magistrate to prevent the petitioner from acting prejudicial to public order. The petitioner argued that the incidents leading to the detention were simple murder cases not affecting public order. However, the Court held that the murders were committed to promote the party's cause, impacting public order significantly. A similar contention was rejected in a previous case (Writ Petition No. 190 of 1972).2. The petitioner claimed that the detention order was passed during a pending prosecution for the same incidents, rendering it invalid. The Court cited a previous judgment (Writ Petition No. 112 of 1972) stating that passing a detention order during a prosecution does not necessarily vitiate the order, especially in anticipation of discharge or acquittal.3. Another challenge was the delay in considering the petitioner's representation, which took about 40 days. The Court acknowledged the delay but accepted the explanation provided by the Government, citing the post-war situation with refugees as a valid reason for the delay.4. The last contention was regarding the scope of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971. The petitioner argued that the Act was for internal security and not for public order maintenance. However, the Court interpreted 'internal security' broadly enough to include public order maintenance, as disturbances threatening state security can directly impact public order. The petition was dismissed based on these grounds.Conclusion:The Supreme Court upheld the detention order under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971, emphasizing the impact of the petitioner's actions on public order, rejecting challenges related to pending prosecution, delay in representation, and interpreting the Act's scope to cover public order maintenance under the umbrella of internal security.