Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether grey fabrics held in stock were to be treated as inputs or finished goods for the purpose of transitional Cenvat credit under the notification, and whether the credit taken on that basis was admissible.
Analysis: The notification provided different credit treatment for inputs and finished goods in respect of declared stock. The decisive question was the character of the declared grey fabrics in the hands of the assessee. The assessee was registered as a manufacturer, maintained records as a manufacturing unit, and treated grey fabrics as input in its statutory records. The adjudicating authority did not give cogent findings to establish that the grey fabrics were the assessee's finished goods. The appellate authority found that the stock was correctly treated as input and that credit was taken under the appropriate serial entry of the notification.
Conclusion: The grey fabrics were rightly treated as inputs, and the Cenvat credit was admissible. The Revenue's challenge failed.