Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether bail could be granted in an offence involving commercial quantity of ganja under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 without satisfying the mandatory conditions in Section 37.
Analysis: Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 imposes additional and cumulative restrictions on bail in respect of offences involving commercial quantity. Before granting bail, the court must give the Public Prosecutor an opportunity to oppose the application and, where opposed, must be satisfied on reasonable grounds that the is not guilty and is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. The expression "reasonable grounds" requires more than prima facie satisfaction. In the present matter, neither the trial court nor the High Court applied these statutory limitations while granting bail, despite the seizure and the nature of the alleged offence.
Conclusion: Bail could not be sustained because the mandatory requirements of Section 37 were not considered or satisfied, and the order granting bail was liable to be set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: In offences under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 involving commercial quantity, bail cannot be granted unless the court first complies with Section 37 and records satisfaction on both statutory conditions.