Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, facing allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 involving commercial quantity, satisfied the twin requirements for bail under Section 37.
Analysis: Bail in commercial quantity cases is controlled by the special restriction in Section 37, which requires opportunity to the Public Prosecutor and the Court's satisfaction that there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and will not commit any offence while on bail. The material against the petitioner was limited to the co-accused's statement and a few phone calls, while the co-accused's confession was treated as prima facie inadmissible against the petitioner. The recovery was not from the petitioner directly, and the surrounding circumstances were found insufficient to attract the full rigour of the statutory bar. The Court also held that stringent conditions could address concerns about absconding, tampering, or repetition of the offence.
Conclusion: The petitioner satisfied the statutory threshold for bail under Section 37 and was entitled to release on bail, subject to strict conditions.
Final Conclusion: The petition for bail was allowed and the petitioner was directed to be released on conditions designed to secure appearance and prevent misuse of liberty.
Ratio Decidendi: In prosecutions involving commercial quantity under the NDPS Act, bail may be granted only when the Court records satisfaction, on reasonable grounds, that the accused is not guilty and will not commit an offence while on bail, and co-accused confession alone cannot suffice to defeat bail where independent material is weak.