TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal condones delay, remands case for reconsideration</h1> <h3>COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS Versus INSTRUMENTATION LTD.</h3> The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing cross objections, citing pursuing a refund application with Assistant Collector, Bombay as per directions of ... Appeal - Cross objection - Condonation of delay - Late submission of cross objection Issues involved: Condonation of delay in filing cross objections, Jurisdiction of Assistant Collector, Bombay vs. Kota, Remand of the matter for consideration on merits.Condonation of Delay: The respondents sought condonation of delay in filing cross objections, citing pursuing refund application with Assistant Collector, Bombay as per directions of Collector (Appeals). The learned Consultant argued for condonation based on judgments allowing exclusion of time spent in wrong forum. The JDR opposed, stating the applicant was aware of the right to file cross objections. The Tribunal, considering the facts and judgments cited, held the delay was condoned due to sufficient cause.Jurisdiction Issue: The matter involved the jurisdiction of Assistant Collector, Bombay vs. Kota. The Collector (Appeals) directed the appellants to approach Assistant Collector, Bombay for refund claims. The Tribunal referred to a judgment emphasizing effective clearances for jurisdiction determination. Relying on this, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, remanding the matter to Collector (Appeals) for reconsideration on merits, affirming Assistant Collector, Kota's jurisdiction.Remand for Consideration on Merits: The Tribunal directed Collector (Appeals) to redecide the appeals on merits, granting opportunity of hearing to respondents and observing principles of natural justice. The 36 appeals were allowed by way of remand, with cross objections disposed of accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
