Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the criminal cases pending against the petitioner should be transferred outside the State of Punjab on the ground of a reasonable apprehension that he would not get justice there.
Analysis: The petitioner supported his request with uncontroverted affidavit material showing political rivalry, alleged official hostility, and circumstances suggesting that strong parties opposed to him might influence the local administration. The Court held that it was not necessary to establish actual judicial bias; the real question was whether the petitioner could reasonably entertain an apprehension that he would not get justice. Applying the principle that justice must not only be done but must also be seen to be done, the Court found sufficient circumstances to support that apprehension and concluded that the interests of justice required transfer.
Conclusion: The transfer was justified and the cases were ordered to be transferred outside the State of Punjab.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded because the circumstances disclosed a reasonable apprehension of injustice, warranting transfer of the pending criminal cases to another district for trial according to law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a party shows circumstances giving rise to a reasonable apprehension of not receiving justice, transfer may be ordered to secure both the reality and the appearance of fairness in the administration of justice.