Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the directors of a company could be fastened with liability under section 179 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, when the company was disputing the assessment and the tax demand had been substantially reduced.
Analysis: Section 179 makes directors of a private company jointly and severally liable for tax dues only where recovery from the company fails and the directors do not establish that such non-recovery was not due to their gross neglect, misfeasance or breach of duty. The company had challenged the assessment throughout and the tax liability had been sharply reduced from the original demand to a much lower figure. On those facts, the non-recovery of tax could not be attributed to any neglect or breach of duty by the directors. The challenge to the assessment itself was treated as sufficient to negative the statutory basis for fastening liability on them.
Conclusion: The notices and revisional order under section 179 were unsustainable and were quashed; the petitioners succeeded.