Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether non-placement and non-consideration of the bail order, which imposed substantial restrictions on the detenu, vitiated the detention order despite the severability provision under Section 5A of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974.
Analysis: The order of preventive detention depends on the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority, and every relevant and vital document that may influence that satisfaction must be placed before the authority. A bail order may become a vital document when it contains substantial restraints on liberty, such as weekly attendance, retention of passport, and restrictions on leaving the city or country, because such conditions bear directly on the likelihood of the detenu fleeing from justice and on the need for detention. The existence of another document, such as an application for cancellation of bail, does not cure the omission where the actual bail order itself was not considered. Section 5A does not save a detention order when the defect goes to the decision-making process and vitiates the subjective satisfaction itself.
Conclusion: The non-placement and non-consideration of the bail order vitiated the detention order, and the challenge to detention succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a bail order imposes substantial restraints on liberty, it is a vital document for preventive detention, and omission to place it before the detaining authority vitiates the detention order by impairing subjective satisfaction.