Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether a holder of a stage carriage permit granted under the repealed Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 was required, after 1 July 1989, to obtain a fresh permit and then seek renewal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. (ii) Whether named operators whose permits were saved under approved nationalised schemes could claim renewal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and what was the legal effect of renewals granted under Section 81 after the new Act came into force.
Issue (i): Whether a holder of a stage carriage permit granted under the repealed Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 was required, after 1 July 1989, to obtain a fresh permit and then seek renewal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Analysis: The repeal provision preserved only those acts, orders and permits under the old law which were not inconsistent with the new Act. A permit under the old Act continued only for its original life under the same conditions, but renewal under Section 81 of the new Act was not a vested or accrued right. Renewal is a fresh grant and must be preceded by a valid application for a permit under Sections 70, 71 and 72. If no pending renewal application existed on the date of commencement, the holder could not bypass the new permitting scheme.
Conclusion: Fresh permit proceedings under the new Act were required, and renewal under Section 81 could not be claimed as of right on the basis of the repealed Act.
Issue (ii): Whether named operators whose permits were saved under approved nationalised schemes could claim renewal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and what was the legal effect of renewals granted under Section 81 after the new Act came into force.
Analysis: Approved schemes continued to operate as self-contained and self-operative laws until modified or cancelled. The rights of named private operators saved in such schemes were not destroyed, but their entitlement was confined to the specified permits and the corridor restrictions in the scheme. They alone could seek permits afresh under Sections 70 to 72 and thereafter renewal under Section 81, subject to scrutiny of the scheme and hearing of the State Transport Undertaking. Renewals already granted after commencement, if made under a mistaken view, were to be treated as temporary permits under Section 87 until regular permits were granted or refused.
Conclusion: Named operators saved under the schemes retained a limited right to seek permits and renewal in accordance with the new Act, while the post-commencement renewals already granted were not treated as final renewals under Section 81.
Final Conclusion: The existing judgment was substantially upheld, but the legal position was clarified and modified to require fresh permit proceedings under the new Act, with only the named operators saved under approved schemes entitled to invoke the statutory process within the limits of those schemes.
Ratio Decidendi: On repeal and re-enactment, renewal of a transport permit is not an accrued right; a permit saved by a repealed statute continues only for its original term and any further continuation must conform to the new statutory scheme, while rights preserved under an approved nationalised scheme survive only to the extent the scheme itself saves them.