Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 70B of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act was attracted when goods were brought from outside the State as for own use but were used by a hospital in the course of its activities.
Analysis: Section 70B applies where a person brings goods from outside the State declaring them as for own use and then uses the goods otherwise than for own use. The mere fact that the goods are used by a hospital in the conduct of its activities, or that such use may generate profit, does not by itself convert the use into non-personal or alienative use. The declaration in form 16 was not ative of the issue. The material question was whether the goods were in fact used for the assessee's own purposes, and the finding was that they were so used.
Conclusion: The penalty provision was not attracted and the assessee was entitled to succeed.