Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after the Commissioner set aside the assessment under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the assessee's pending appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) became infructuous.
Analysis: The assessment was set aside and the case remanded by the Commissioner under section 263 while the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was still pending. In that situation, there was no subsisting assessment order for the appellate authority to examine on merits, and the appeal could not survive independently of the revisional order.
Conclusion: The pending appeal became infructuous. The question was answered in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the department.
Ratio Decidendi: Once the assessment is set aside in revision under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, a pending appeal against that assessment becomes infructuous because the original assessment order ceases to subsist for appellate adjudication.