TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether rent receipts from rooms let out by the club to its members along with other facilities were liable to income-tax or were exempt under the doctrine of mutuality; (ii) Whether income from the swimming pool and stadium was assessable as business income and not as income from house property.
Issue (i): Whether rent receipts from rooms let out by the club to its members along with other facilities were liable to income-tax or were exempt under the doctrine of mutuality.
Analysis: The question was answered consistently with the earlier decision between the same parties and with the principle laid down by the Supreme Court in Bankipur Club Ltd., under which receipts arising from mutual dealings between a club and its members are not treated as taxable income.
Conclusion: The rent receipts were not assessable to income-tax under the doctrine of mutuality, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether income from the swimming pool and stadium was assessable as business income and not as income from house property.
Analysis: The Tribunal's finding was upheld because the record did not clearly show that the swimming pool and stadium were let out as mere properties to outsiders, and on that basis the receipts were treated as business income rather than income from house property.
Conclusion: The income from the swimming pool and stadium was rightly taxed under the head of business income and not under the head of income from house property, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: Both reference questions were answered in favour of the assessee, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Receipts from mutual dealings between a club and its members are not taxable as income, and where the character of receipts from club facilities is not shown to be mere letting of property to outsiders, they may be assessed as business income rather than house property income.
TaxTMI 
