Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether steel tubes, pipes and refractories were covered as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 prior to the amendment dated 23.7.1996, and whether modvat credit taken on such goods was admissible.
Analysis: The Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal had concurrently held that the goods in question fell within clauses (a), (b) and (c) of Explanation I to Rule 57Q even before the amendment, and that the later addition of clauses (f) and (g) did not mean that steel tubes, pipes and refractories became capital goods only from 23.7.1996. On that construction, the timing of purchase or incorporation prior to the amendment did not defeat eligibility to credit, since the goods were already covered by the existing definition of capital goods.
Conclusion: The claim to modvat credit on the goods was upheld and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was found to be without merit and no interference was called for with the order granting credit.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the existing definition of capital goods already encompasses the goods in question, a later amendment enlarging the enumeration does not restrict credit for goods covered by the earlier language of the rule.