Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether royalty payments made by a Singapore resident payer to another Singapore resident for broadcasting rights were deemed to arise in India under Article 12(7) of the India-Singapore DTAA and were therefore subject to tax deduction at source under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The royalty source rule under Article 12(7) required either that the payer be a resident of India or, where the payer had a permanent establishment in India, that the liability to pay the royalty was incurred in connection with that permanent establishment and that the royalty was borne by it. The payer was not a resident of India. Mere existence of a permanent establishment in India was insufficient. The decisive test was the presence of an economic link between the royalty obligation and the Indian permanent establishment, together with the burden of payment being borne by that establishment. On the facts, the broadcasting-rights payment was connected with the head office operations in Singapore, and the Indian marketing presence did not incur or bear the liability.
Conclusion: The royalty did not arise in India under Article 12(7) of the DTAA. The payment was not chargeable to tax in India on that basis, and no tax deduction obligation arose on the impugned payment.
Final Conclusion: The treaty source conditions for taxing the royalty in India were not satisfied, so the assessee succeeded on the main question and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Under Article 12(7) of the India-Singapore DTAA, royalty arises in India only if the payer is a resident of India, or if the payer's Indian permanent establishment incurs and bears the liability with an economic nexus to the payment; mere presence of a permanent establishment does not suffice.