Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice issued under section 34(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, after expiry of the original period of limitation was saved by section 4 of Central Act I of 1959.
Analysis: The second proviso to section 34(3) did not apply because the appellate order did not contain a finding or direction on a matter in issue in the assessment proceedings. The fresh notice issued on 9-7-1958 was otherwise beyond the eight-year period, but section 4 of Central Act I of 1959 validated notices issued before the commencement of that Act and barred challenge on the ground of expiry of limitation under the unamended section 34(1)(a). The provision was construed as covering notices issued after the Finance Act, 1956 and before the 1959 validating Act, and the retrospective effect of the section supported that construction.
Conclusion: The notice was saved by section 4 of Central Act I of 1959 and the proceedings were valid; the answer was against the assessees.