Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods in question were classifiable under Heading 59.05/59.06 of the Central Excise Tariff Act and whether the Revenue's appeal could survive in view of the earlier Tribunal decision and the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal before the Supreme Court.
Analysis: The impugned order followed the Tribunal's earlier decision in the assessee's own case, which had held that tyre cord fabrics, when dipped, rubberised or calendered, were classifiable under Heading 59.05, now 59.06, and had directed re-determination of duty on that basis. The Revenue's challenge was stated to be unsupported because the appeal against that earlier Tribunal decision had already been rejected by the Supreme Court, leaving no reason to interfere with the Commissioner (Appeals)' order.
Conclusion: The classification adopted by the Commissioner (Appeals) was upheld and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.