TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court affirms exemption for corrugated box turnover to certified institution under Village Industries rule</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Sales Tax Versus Gelton Industries</h3> The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to allow exemption on the turnover of corrugated boxes sold to a certified institution under a notification ... - Issues:1. Interpretation of a notification granting exemption on sales of goods connected with the manufacture of products of Village Industries.2. Validity of exemption claimed on the turnover of corrugated boxes.3. Assessment of eligibility for exemption based on the certificate provided by the Village Industries institution.4. Authority to deny exemption and take action against the purchaser instead of the seller.Issue 1: Interpretation of the notificationThe case involved the interpretation of a notification exempting the sale of goods connected with the manufacture of products of Village Industries. The Tribunal held that packing material, such as corrugated boxes, qualifies as goods connected with the manufacture of products and is eligible for exemption under the notification. The key point was whether the goods in question fell within the scope of the exemption criteria outlined in the notification.Issue 2: Validity of exemption on corrugated boxesThe dealer had claimed exemption on the turnover of corrugated boxes sold to a certified institution engaged in manufacturing soap. The Assessing Authority initially allowed the exemption, but later, the Deputy Commissioner levied tax on the turnover of corrugated boxes, stating that they did not qualify as goods connected with the manufacture of products of Village Industries. The Tribunal, however, upheld the dealer's appeal, emphasizing that the packing material was indeed eligible for the exemption.Issue 3: Assessment based on the certificateThe Tribunal also considered the authenticity of the certificate provided by the Village Industries institution. It was noted that the certificate was not found to be non-genuine or a result of collusion between the parties. The Tribunal held that as long as the required certificate was submitted, the claim of exemption by the seller could not be denied. The decision highlighted the importance of the certificate in determining eligibility for exemption.Issue 4: Authority to deny exemptionThe High Court affirmed the Tribunal's decision, stating that unless the certificate was found to be forged or obtained through collusion, the exemption could not be denied to the seller. The court referenced previous cases to support this principle. It was emphasized that if the department believed the exemption was not warranted, action should be taken against the purchaser, not the seller. The court concluded that there was no illegality in the assessment order, and the Tribunal rightly quashed the order denying exemption under Section 10-B of the Act.In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the revision, affirming the Tribunal's decision to allow the exemption on the turnover of corrugated boxes sold to the certified institution. The judgment underscored the significance of the certificate provided by the Village Industries institution in determining the eligibility for exemption and clarified the authority's role in assessing exemption claims.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
