Departmental exoneration does not automatically quash criminal prosecution; criminal liability must be tested independently on its own evidence.

Departmental exoneration does not, by itself, bar criminal prosecution arising from the same allegations. The disciplinary authority is not bound by the inquiry officer's report and may differ after notice and opportunity to the delinquent. A criminal case must be assessed independently on the evidence and the stricter criminal standard of proof, because departmental and criminal proceedings operate in different fields. The earlier precedent relied on for quashing was confined to its own facts and did not create a general rule that disciplinary exoneration requires termination of criminal proceedings.

---

---

Issues: Whether exoneration in departmental proceedings ipso facto requires quashing of a criminal prosecution arising from the same allegations.

Analysis: The departmental inquiry had resulted only in a report of the inquiry officer; the disciplinary authority had not finally accepted that report before the High Court quashed the criminal case. The Court held that the disciplinary authority is not bound by the inquiry officer's conclusion and may differ after giving notice and opportunity to the delinquent. The Court further held that a criminal prosecution must be tested on the evidence in the criminal case itself, because the standard of proof in departmental proceedings is materially lower and the two proceedings operate in different fields. The earlier decision relied on for quashing was explained as turning on its own peculiar facts and not laying down any general rule that departmental exoneration bars criminal prosecution.

Conclusion: Exoneration in departmental proceedings does not, by itself, warrant quashing of the criminal prosecution, and the High Court's order quashing the proceedings was erroneous.

Ratio Decidendi: Departmental exoneration is not ipso facto a legal bar to criminal prosecution based on the same allegations; criminal liability must be determined independently on the evidence and standard applicable to the criminal trial.

---