Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal was maintainable before the High Court under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, in view of the nature of the dispute relating to exemption notification coverage, and whether the remedy lay before the Supreme Court under Section 130E of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: The dispute was treated as one concerning whether the goods were covered by an exemption notification and the EXIM Policy, an issue which, in the cited precedent, was held to fall outside the High Court's jurisdiction under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. In view of that binding position, and since the appellant did not dispute the legal position, the appeal could not be entertained by the High Court and the appropriate forum was the Supreme Court under Section 130E of the Customs Act, 1962.
Conclusion: The appeal was not maintainable before the High Court and was disposed of accordingly, leaving the appellant to pursue the remedy before the Supreme Court.