Referable question of law arose from consequential penalty findings under income-tax proceedings and warranted reference to the High Court.

A penalty under section 140A(3) was treated as consequential to the quantum findings, and the Tribunal recorded that the assessee's computation of tax under section 140A was bona fide because the section 115E issue had been decided in the assessee's favour. On that basis, the High Court stated that a referable question of law arose from the Tribunal's order for consideration under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The document explains that where the penalty flows from the quantum proceedings and the Tribunal's own reasoning generates a legal controversy, reference of the question to the High Court is warranted.

---

---

Issues: Whether a referable question of law arose from the Tribunal's order so as to warrant a direction under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to state the case and refer the question to the High Court.

Analysis: The penalty under section 140A(3) was treated as consequential to the findings recorded in the quantum proceedings. The Tribunal had itself noted that the assessee's calculation of tax payable under section 140A was bona fide because the issue relating to applicability of section 115E had been decided in the assessee's favour. In that backdrop, the High Court found that the proposed question of law was not merely factual but was referable and arose from the Tribunal's order.

Conclusion: A referable question of law was held to arise, and the Tribunal was directed to refer the question to the High Court under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded and the Tribunal was required to forward the question of law along with the statement of the case for opinion of the High Court.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a penalty order is consequential to quantum findings and the Tribunal's reasoning itself gives rise to a legal controversy, the existence of a referable question of law under section 256(2) is established.

---