Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could be demanded and quantified before finalization of assessment under Rule 9B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The assessment for the relevant period remained pending and the principal duty liability had not yet been finally determined. In a provisional assessment regime, the duty provisionally assessed is only adjusted against the duty finally assessed, and the assessee's liability becomes conclusive only upon completion of the final assessment. In such circumstances, a demand for interest linked to the alleged short payment of duty was held to be premature. The Court also relied on the principle that proceedings under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be initiated without completing the assessment process.
Conclusion: The demand of interest before finalization of assessment was unsustainable and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.