Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was justified where credit taken on inputs used in manufacture of exempted goods had been reversed and the assessee relied on Rule 6(3)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.
Analysis: The applicant had reversed the Cenvat credit attributable to inputs used in the exempted clearances. The order records that this gave the applicant a strong prima facie case under Rule 6(3)(a), and therefore the demand was not a proper ground to insist on pre-deposit at this stage.
Outcome: Waiver of duty and penalty pre-deposit was granted and the stay petition was allowed.