Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the charges for transportation of imported goods by barges from the mother vessel at the anchorage point to the jetty were includible in the assessable value of the goods for customs purposes, and whether the importer was entitled to consequential refund subject to unjust enrichment.
Analysis: The imported goods were unloaded at the anchorage point because the vessel could not reach the jetty due to operational constraints. The barges were used only for local transport from the mother vessel to the jetty. The binding principle applied was that where freight up to the Indian port has already been accounted for, further addition of transportation charges for moving the goods by barge from the mother ship to the jetty is impermissible in valuation. The Tribunal followed the Supreme Court's ruling that such extra charges arising from an extraordinary situation cannot be added to the assessable value. The refund claim remained subject to examination of unjust enrichment.
Conclusion: The barge transportation charges were not includible in the assessable value. The appeals by the importer succeeded on merits, and the refund claims were to be allowed subject to clearance on the unjust enrichment aspect.