Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1955 (8) TMI 37 - HC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Article 20(3) protection extends to compelled customs evidence, while search warrants imply authority to seize covered goods and documents. Article 20(3) was held to protect a person formally accused of an offence from being compelled, even at a customs enquiry stage, to appear, give evidence, ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Article 20(3) protection extends to compelled customs evidence, while search warrants imply authority to seize covered goods and documents.

                            Article 20(3) was held to protect a person formally accused of an offence from being compelled, even at a customs enquiry stage, to appear, give evidence, or produce incriminating documents. Section 171A of the Sea Customs Act was therefore invalid to the extent it authorised compulsory self-incriminatory notices. By contrast, a search warrant under Section 172 for prohibited goods and related documents was treated as carrying implied authority to seize articles found in execution of the search. The omission of an express seizure direction did not make the seizure unlawful, so the challenge to restoration of the goods and documents failed.




                            Issues: (i) Whether Section 171A of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 was unconstitutional to the extent it compelled a person accused of an offence to appear, give evidence, or produce documents that might incriminate him, in violation of Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India; (ii) Whether the seizure of goods and documents under the search warrants issued under Section 172 of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 was illegal for want of an express authority to seize.

                            Issue (i): Whether Section 171A of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 was unconstitutional to the extent it compelled a person accused of an offence to appear, give evidence, or produce documents that might incriminate him, in violation of Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India.

                            Analysis: The protection under Article 20(3) extends beyond oral testimony in a courtroom and covers compelled production of documents and other evidentiary acts where a person has been formally accused of conduct punishable as an offence. The customs enquiry under Section 171A was treated as a judicial proceeding for the relevant penal purposes, and the persons summoned had already been accused of contraventions capable of resulting in prosecution and punishment. A distinction was drawn between a mere opportunity to explain under the show-cause type notice and compulsory attendance, truthfulness, and production of documents under Section 171A. The compelled furnishing of evidence at this stage was held capable of leading to self-incrimination in later criminal proceedings.

                            Conclusion: Section 171A was bad to the extent that it authorised compelled self-incriminatory evidence from a person accused of an offence, and the notices issued under it could not stand.

                            Issue (ii): Whether the seizure of goods and documents under the search warrants issued under Section 172 of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 was illegal for want of an express authority to seize.

                            Analysis: A warrant issued under Section 172 for search of dutiable or prohibited goods, and after amendment documents relating to such goods, necessarily carried with it the power to seize what was found, because search without custody would defeat the statutory purpose. The omission of an express direction for seizure in the warrant did not invalidate the action where the search itself was lawful and the articles seized were within the subject matter of the warrant. As to the goods, they were treated as prohibited goods and, on the materials and the notices issued, as articles within the customs preventive power. The documents stood on the same footing once they were covered by the amended search power.

                            Conclusion: The seizure was not illegal merely because the warrant did not expressly mention seizure, and no direction for restoration of the goods or documents was warranted on that ground.

                            Final Conclusion: The application succeeded only in respect of the compulsory notices under Section 171A, while the challenge to the seizure of the goods and documents failed.

                            Ratio Decidendi: Article 20(3) forbids compelled production of incriminating evidence from a person formally accused of an offence even at a preliminary enquiry stage, and a statutory search warrant for prohibited goods and related documents implies authority to seize the articles found in execution of the search.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found