Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice issued under section 34 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 was barred by limitation and, if so, whether it was saved by the second proviso to section 34(3), section 34(4), or section 4 of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1959.
Analysis: The notice was issued on 5 January 1962 in respect of escaped income below one lakh of rupees. The second proviso to section 34(3) could not sustain the notice because the proviso, so far as it removed the time bar for reassessments made in consequence of findings or directions in appellate orders, had been declared unconstitutional as offending article 14 of the Constitution of India. Section 34(4) also did not apply, because it preserved notices issued after the 1959 amendment only in cases where the escaped income exceeded the threshold contemplated by the amended proviso, and it did not override the limitation applicable to smaller escapements. Section 4 of the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1959 protected only notices issued before the commencement of that Act and the reassessments made in consequence of such notices; it did not extend to a notice first issued in 1962.
Conclusion: The notice was time-barred and none of the relied-upon provisions saved it.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded and the impugned notice was quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: A notice under section 34 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 cannot be sustained where the applicable limitation has expired unless it is clearly saved by a valid statutory exception, and a saving provision cannot be extended beyond its plain terms.