Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's appeal was maintainable in view of the CBDT instruction prescribing a monetary threshold for filing departmental appeals before the Tribunal.
Analysis: The appeal involved a tax effect below the prescribed limit of Rs. 3 lakhs under CBDT Instruction No. 3 of 2011 dated 9 February 2011. The instruction bars the Revenue from preferring appeals before the Tribunal where the tax effect, excluding interest, is below the prescribed monetary limit. Since the tax payable in the present appeal was below that threshold, the appeal was not maintainable.
Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal was not maintainable and was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: A departmental appeal before the Tribunal is not maintainable where the tax effect, excluding interest, is below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT instruction applicable at the time of filing.