Block assessment addition cannot rest on suspicion alone without incriminating material or proof of unaccounted cash transactions.

An addition in block assessment based on alleged accommodation entries and a searched person's statement could not be sustained without incriminating material showing actual unaccounted cash transactions. The loans were recorded in the regular books, and interest was paid with tax deduction at source, which undermined the inference of undisclosed income. In the absence of evidence that the assessee had paid cash and received accommodation cheques, the addition rested only on suspicion and a third-party statement. The addition was deleted and the assessee succeeded.

---

---

Issues: Whether the addition made as undisclosed income in block assessment on the basis of alleged accommodation entries and the statement of the searched person was sustainable.

Analysis: The addition was founded on the statement recorded during search and the inference that the assessee had received cheques against cash, but no material was brought to show that the assessee had in fact paid cash and received accommodation cheques. The loans were reflected in the regular books, and interest was also paid with tax deduction at source. In the absence of incriminating material establishing unaccounted cash or the alleged accommodation arrangement, the addition could not be sustained merely on suspicion.

Conclusion: The addition was deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The block assessment addition did not survive judicial scrutiny, and the assessee succeeded in the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: An addition in block assessment cannot be upheld solely on suspicion or a third party statement unless supported by incriminating material showing actual unaccounted transactions; duly recorded loans and related payments cannot be treated as undisclosed income without such proof.

---