Classification of supari upheld on pouch description, while unexplained valuation was remitted for fresh determination.

Goods described on the pouches as Pooja Scented Supari, with ingredients including betel nut, cardamom, clove and added flavour, were treated as scented supari because the description and contents supported that factual classification and there was no indication of sugar or sweetener for meethi supari. The valuation adopted by the authorities was set aside because the figure was fixed without explaining how it was derived or whether the assessee's invoice had been examined and rejected. The matter was remitted for fresh determination of value, while the classification finding was sustained.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the consignment was correctly classified as Scented Supari or Meethi Supari; (ii) Whether the valuation of the consignment at Rs. 2,70,000 was sustainable.

Issue (i): Whether the consignment was correctly classified as Scented Supari or Meethi Supari.

Analysis: The description on the pouches referred to the goods as Pooja Scented Supari and the ingredients stated betel nut, cardamom, clove and added flavour. On that basis, the authorities treated the goods as scented supari. The Court found this to be a factual determination supported by the contents of the pouches and the absence of any indication of sugar or sweetener that would support the claim of Meethi Supari.

Conclusion: The classification as Scented Supari was upheld and the finding was against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the valuation of the consignment at Rs. 2,70,000 was sustainable.

Analysis: The record showed that the assessee consistently asserted a consignment value of Rs. 1,17,000, but the authorities fixed the value at Rs. 2,70,000 without explaining how that figure was reached or whether the invoice had been examined and rejected. The valuation finding therefore lacked a reasoned basis and could not stand.

Conclusion: The valuation finding was quashed and the matter was remitted for fresh determination of value, in favour of the assessee on this issue.

Final Conclusion: The classification finding was sustained, but the valuation finding was set aside and sent back for fresh consideration, leaving the revisions only partly successful.

Ratio Decidendi: A factual classification of goods may be sustained where the description and ingredients on the goods support that conclusion, but a valuation finding must rest on a reasoned examination of the material and cannot survive if the basis for the figure is unexplained.

---