Functional integration of a ginning unit with a textile undertaking sustained takeover under the sick textile law.

The ginning and pressing factory was treated as part of the textile undertaking because the record showed functional and managerial integration: the cotton processed there was used in the mill, supervision and control were common, salaries were paid from the same account, and administrative and clerical staff were shared. Separate balance-sheet entries and separate provident fund schemes were insufficient to establish a distinct establishment. The takeover under the Sick Textile Undertakings (Taking Over of Management) Act was therefore upheld, and the wider question whether a separate establishment could still fall within the undertaking's property was left undecided.

---

---

Issues: Whether the ginning and pressing factory formed part of the textile undertaking and was validly taken over under the Sick Textile Undertakings (Taking Over of Management) Act.

Analysis: The separate entries in the balance-sheet and the existence of separate provident fund schemes were insufficient to establish that the ginning and pressing unit was a distinct and separate establishment. The common use of the cotton ginned and pressed in the mill, together with common supervision and control, payment of salaries from the same account, and common administrative and clerical staff, showed that the ginning and pressing factory was integrated with the textile undertaking. The Court also noticed the breadth of Section 4(3), but found it unnecessary to decide the wider question whether even a separate establishment could be treated as property within the undertaking.

Conclusion: The ginning and pressing factory was held to be part and parcel of the textile undertaking, and the challenge to the takeover failed.

---