Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the payment made to the co-sharers out of the managing agency commission was allowable as expenditure under Section 10(2)(ix) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, or was capital expenditure.
Analysis: The payment was made as part of the arrangement by which finance was procured for the company in financial difficulty, and the managing agents entered into the obligation in the course of carrying on their agency business. On a commercial view, the payment was incurred to enable the agents to continue and preserve the profit-earning apparatus of the agency and to earn the balance of the commission. It was not a capital outlay for acquisition of a source of income, but a recurring payment out of revenue commission received from year to year. The assignment of the commission portion to the lender also supported the view that the amount no longer formed part of the assessees' income in the relevant sense.
Conclusion: The payment was allowable as revenue expenditure and was not capital expenditure; the answer was in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A payment made as part of a commercially necessary arrangement for financing the business, incurred in the course of earning managing agency commission and not for acquiring a source of income, is deductible as expenditure laid out solely for earning profits and is not capital expenditure.