Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's fractional inheritance in a house, without occupation by him or his family and without maintenance of the house for his benefit, satisfied the requirement of a dwelling house maintained for him within the taxable territories under section 4A(a)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The assessee was only a co-heir with a fractional share in the house. The house was in the actual occupation of other co-heirs, who used it as their own dwelling house. The assessee's wife and children lived elsewhere, and his temporary visits to India did not make the house his home or dwelling house. Mere ownership of a fractional share, without a right actually exercised to occupy the house as of right and without any maintenance of the house for the assessee's benefit, was insufficient to satisfy the statutory requirement. The requirement was not merely that a house exist in the taxable territories, but that it should be the assessee's home and be maintained for him.
Conclusion: The statutory conditions were not satisfied, and the answer was against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Mere ownership of a fractional share in a house does not constitute a dwelling house maintained for the assessee unless he can occupy it as of right and it is maintained for his benefit.