TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court rules in favor of assessee on book profits calculation under Income-tax Act</h1> The High Court of Madhya Pradesh ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the computation of book profits under section 115J of the Income-tax ... Book Profits, Unabsorbed Depreciation Issues:1. Computation of book profits under section 115J of the Income-tax Act, 1961 considering unabsorbed depreciation of earlier years.Detailed Analysis:The judgment by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh involved a case where the Tribunal referred a question of law under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1989-90. The question revolved around the computation of book profits for the purpose of section 115J of the Act, specifically regarding the inclusion of unabsorbed depreciation of earlier years. The assessee had claimed carry forward of losses and contested the computation of book profits by the Assessing Officer. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) upheld the Assessing Officer's decision, leading the assessee to appeal to the Tribunal.The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer to compute the book profits in line with a Special Bench decision in the case of Surana Steels Pvt. Ltd. The Department, dissatisfied with this decision, filed an application under section 256(1) of the Act, leading to the reference of the question to the High Court. The High Court heard arguments from both parties and noted a similar case where a comparable question was decided against the Department.The High Court considered the Tribunal's decision in Surana Steels Pvt. Ltd. case, where it was held that the assessee's book profit for section 115J should be recalculated by including unabsorbed depreciation of earlier years. Referring to legal precedents, the court emphasized the interpretation of 'loss' in Explanation (iv) to section 115J and noted a Supreme Court decision supporting the allowance of carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation.Based on the legal position and factual matrix, the High Court concluded that the Tribunal's decision was legally sound. Therefore, the High Court answered the question in favor of the assessee and against the Department. The reference was disposed of without costs, and a copy of the order was to be transmitted to the Tribunal as per legal requirements.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
