Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an employee who acquires a locomotor disability during service is entitled to the protection of Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995, including consideration for alternative employment or a supernumerary post, notwithstanding invalidity pension under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972.
Analysis: The disability suffered by the employee fell within the statutory definition of locomotor disability and was acquired during service. The Act separately defines "disability" and "person with disability", and Section 47 specifically protects an employee who acquires a disability during service. That provision is mandatory in form and substance: the establishment cannot dispense with or reduce the rank of such employee, and if the employee is unsuitable for the original post, he must be shifted to another post with the same pay and service benefits or kept on a supernumerary post until a suitable post becomes available or superannuation is reached. The Act is a special and beneficial statute enacted to secure equal opportunities and full participation for persons with disabilities, and therefore its protection cannot be overridden by the general pension rule under which invalidity pension is paid. The grant of invalidity pension does not negate the statutory obligation under Section 47. Section 72 reinforces that the Act operates in addition to, and not in derogation of, other laws.
Conclusion: The employee was entitled to the protection of Section 47, and the employer was bound to consider alternative accommodation or other statutory relief instead of terminating service.