Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product known as "Chocos" was correctly classifiable under Heading 18.04 or Heading 19.04 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, having regard to Chapter Note 3 of Chapter 19 and the method adopted for determining cocoa content.
Analysis: The product was found to be a cereal preparation coated with a food preparation containing cocoa. The chemical test report assessed cocoa content at 15.7% on a defatted basis, which exceeded the 6% limit in Chapter Note 3 to Chapter 19. The objection that cocoa content had to be tested only by the HSN method was rejected, as the Tariff note was not completely aligned with HSN and the method adopted by the department was supported by technical literature and expert opinion. The finding on cocoa content was not rebutted by any contrary expert evidence. The alternative reasoning based on the coating of the product with a cocoa-containing preparation also supported exclusion from Heading 19.04.
Conclusion: The product was held to fall under Heading 18.04 and not under Heading 19.04, and the assessee's challenge to the classification failed.