Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reconstituted firm was entitled to exemption under Section 4-A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act and whether Section 4-A(2-B) barred consideration of its application for eligibility certificate.
Analysis: The exemption provision was intended to encourage setting up of new industrial units and had to be construed liberally. A mere change in constitution or succession of the partnership did not by itself destroy the character of the unit as a new unit for the purposes of exemption. Section 4-A(2-B) dealt with succession in respect of the unexpired portion of an exemption period and required application within the prescribed time, but that provision was held inapplicable on the facts because the exemption period had already expired before its introduction. Since the reconstituted firm had itself moved the exemption application and the reconstitution was brought on record, the requirement of intimation and consideration of succession stood substantially satisfied.
Conclusion: The rejection of exemption was not justified and the reconstituted firm was held entitled to consideration for issuance of the eligibility certificate, subject to fulfillment of the other conditions of law.
Final Conclusion: The revision was allowed, the Tribunal's order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for grant of eligibility certificate if the statutory conditions were satisfied.
Ratio Decidendi: Incentive provisions granting tax exemption for new industrial units must be construed liberally, and reconstitution or succession of the firm does not by itself defeat exemption where the unit otherwise satisfies the statutory conditions.