Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to set-off of entry tax paid on paper used for manufacturing corrugated boxes, on the footing that corrugated boxes fell within the expression "paper products including exercise books" in the relevant notification.
Analysis: The notification granting set-off was construed as applying only where the raw material or processing material was used in the manufacture of paper products falling within the notified expression. The clarification issued contemporaneously by the State Government stated that the expression did not cover packing material. The Court treated this contemporaneous construction as a permissible interpretative aid and held that corrugated boxes were packing material and therefore outside the scope of the notified entry. The argument based on a broader expression in a different notification and the Bombay High Court decision on "paper of all kinds" was found distinguishable.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to the set-off claimed, and the Revenue's appeal was rightly allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption or set-off notification is confined to specified paper products, packing material cannot be brought within it by interpretation, and contemporaneous departmental construction may be used to ascertain the scope of the notified entry.