Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount deposited for obtaining declaration form XXXI under the departmental circular was a security deposit and, if so, whether the assessee was entitled to interest on delayed refund of the excess amount under section 29(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948.
Analysis: The amount was deposited only for obtaining declaration form XXXI in terms of the circular issued under section 8C(3A) of the Act. It was not a payment towards compounding money. The amount was required to be adjusted against the tax liability at the stage of final assessment, and that adjustment had in fact been made. Once the excess amount remained with the department beyond the lawful period and was subsequently refunded, the department could not deny interest by characterising the deposit as compounding money. The statutory consequence of delayed refund attracted section 29(2) of the Act.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to interest on the delayed refund of the excess amount, and the department was required to calculate and pay the same under section 29(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948.
Ratio Decidendi: A deposit made for obtaining import declaration forms, when treated as adjustable security and not as compounding money, carries statutory interest on delayed refund of the excess amount.