Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment orders passed after remand were within the one-year limitation prescribed under section 21(4) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act.
Analysis: Section 21(4) required the reassessment to be made within one year from the date of receipt by the assessing authority of the copy of the order remanding the case. The record showed that the appellate orders were received in the department and entered in the receipt register, and the Sales Tax Officer gave a detailed explanation for the preparation of a duplicate file and the subsequent passing of the assessment orders. The explanation was found plausible and there was no sufficient basis to disbelieve it or to treat the records as falsified. On the material placed, the court accepted that the reassessment was completed within the statutory period.
Conclusion: The reassessment orders were held to be within limitation and the challenge failed.