Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment for assessment year 2005-06 could be completed beyond 20 November 2009 in view of section 29(4A), and whether the Commissioner could extend the limitation period under section 29(4).
Analysis: Section 29(4A) was inserted with a non obstante clause and expressly provided that assessment for the relevant year could be made only within three years from 20 November 2006. The provision was read on its plain language and was held to override section 29(4), including the power to extend time. On that construction, the extension granted for completing the assessment had no legal effect, and the assessment made on 26 March 2010 was beyond the prescribed period.
Conclusion: The assessment was time-barred and the extension could not validate it.
Final Conclusion: The statutory time limit for assessment under the special amendment prevailed over the general extension power, leaving no scope to sustain the impugned assessment.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a later provision prescribing a fixed limitation period contains a non obstante clause, it overrides the earlier extension power and the assessment must be completed within the period expressly prescribed.