Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment proceedings and the assessment order were invalid for having been initiated and completed before communication of the advance ruling, in breach of the statutory scheme governing advance rulings under the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005.
Analysis: The assessment was initiated while the advance ruling application was still pending and before the ruling was communicated to the dealer. The statutory framework required the Advance Ruling Authority to pronounce its ruling within the prescribed time, and section 67(3) barred initiation or continuation of assessment proceedings in disregard of that pending ruling process. Since the show-cause notice and the assessment order were issued before communication of the ruling, the assessment action was contrary to the statutory mandate. The revenue fairly conceded the point.
Conclusion: The assessment order was invalid and liable to be quashed. Fresh assessment could be initiated in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute suspends or restricts assessment action pending communication of an advance ruling, any assessment initiated or completed in breach of that statutory bar is invalid.