Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment made pursuant to an appellate remand was barred by limitation under Section 37 of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005, and whether reliance on Section 21(4) of that Act was erroneous.
Analysis: Section 37 contains a non obstante clause and specifically governs assessment, reassessment, rectification, or revision made in consequence of findings or directions contained in an appellate order. It requires such action to be taken within three years from the date of receipt of the relevant order by the prescribed authority. The appellate order remanding the matter was received by the assessing authority on 29 October 2008, so the reassessment ought to have been completed on or before 28 October 2011. Since the reassessment order was passed only on 31 August 2012, it was beyond the statutory period. The reliance placed on Section 21(4) was misplaced because that provision does not govern reassessment consequent on appellate intervention.
Conclusion: The reassessment was time-barred under Section 37 and was unsustainable; the contrary view based on Section 21(4) was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a reassessment is made in consequence of an appellate order, the special limitation provision governing such consequential action prevails over the general assessment limitation provision, and any reassessment beyond that special period is void as time-barred.