Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was liable to be interfered with in writ jurisdiction for violation of natural justice despite the availability of statutory appeal; whether denial of sufficient opportunity to examine voluminous material vitiated the assessment.
Analysis: The assessment proceedings were initiated under the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and the petitioner was served with notice only shortly before the assessment deadline. A large volume of documents was supplied in stages, leaving insufficient time to study the material and submit a defence. In these circumstances, the opportunity of hearing was not a meaningful pre-decisional hearing but an empty formality. The availability of appeal does not oust writ jurisdiction where there is a breach of natural justice, and an appellate remedy cannot be treated as effective when no defence has been properly placed before the assessing authority for consideration.
Conclusion: The assessment order was vitiated by violation of principles of natural justice and was rightly challenged in writ jurisdiction notwithstanding the alternate remedy.
Final Conclusion: The assessment order was quashed and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after affording the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to present its defence.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a quasi-judicial tax assessment is made without affording a real and reasonable opportunity of hearing, the writ court may intervene despite an alternative appellate remedy, because breach of natural justice renders the statutory remedy ineffective in the circumstances.