Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of computing limitation under Section 35 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, the date on which the impugned order was received by the assessee was to be excluded, and whether the departmental appeal was therefore within time.
Analysis: Section 35 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 required an appeal to be filed within three months from the date of the decision or order appealed against. Applying the principle of exclusion of the starting date embodied in Section 12 of the Limitation Act, the date of receipt of the order was held to be excluded from the computation. On that basis, the appeal presented on 22-11-1978 fell within the prescribed period. The contrary finding of the appellate authority that the appeal was barred by limitation was therefore unsustainable.
Conclusion: The limitation objection was rejected in favour of the assessee, and the appeal was held to be in time.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order dismissing the appeal as time-barred was set aside, and the matter was sent back for consideration on merits.
Ratio Decidendi: In computing the period of limitation for an appeal under Section 35 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, the date of receipt of the order appealed against must be excluded by applying the exclusion principle reflected in Section 12 of the Limitation Act.