Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1982 (4) TMI 286 - AT - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal affirms concessional duty for Rourkela Steel Plant expansion under Customs Tariff Act The Tribunal upheld the order-in-appeal and dismissed the review notice, finding that the modernization and revamping of the Rourkela Steel Plant ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal affirms concessional duty for Rourkela Steel Plant expansion under Customs Tariff Act

                            The Tribunal upheld the order-in-appeal and dismissed the review notice, finding that the modernization and revamping of the Rourkela Steel Plant constituted substantial expansion, justifying the concessional duty rate under Heading 84.66 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The Tribunal determined that the conditions for registration were substantially met, contrary to the Assistant Collector's rejection, and ruled in favor of the respondents.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Review of order-in-appeal.
                            2. Registration of contracts for concessional duty under Heading 84.66 of C.T.A., 1975.
                            3. Interpretation of "substantial expansion" versus "modernization and revamping."
                            4. Compliance with the Project Import (Registration of Contract) Regulations, 1965.
                            5. Relevance of industrial licence amendment under Section 13 of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Review of Order-in-Appeal:
                            The Government of India issued a notice to review the order-in-appeal No. S/49-1369/79R, dated 20-3-1980, passed by the Appellate Collector of Customs, Bombay. The review was conducted under Section 131(3) of the Customs Act, 1962. The respondents replied to the notice on 5th February 1981. The proceedings were transferred to the Tribunal for disposal under Section 131B(2) of the Act.

                            2. Registration of Contracts for Concessional Duty:
                            The respondents applied for registration of contracts for importing goods required for the modernization of the Rourkela Steel Plant under Heading 84.66 of C.T.A., 1975, which provides a concessional rate of duty. The goods were covered by three import licenses dated 29-8-1978 and endorsed as "Project Import." The Assistant Collector rejected the application, stating that the goods were not required for the initial setting up or substantial expansion of a unit, and thus did not fall under Heading 84.66.

                            3. Interpretation of "Substantial Expansion" versus "Modernization and Revamping":
                            The Appellate Collector observed that modernization and revamping could result in substantial expansion. He noted that the modernization program would increase the actual working capacity by 56% and the installed capacity by 10%. He argued that "substantial expansion" should be interpreted in terms of actual working capacity rather than licensed capacity. The Assistant Collector's narrow interpretation of "modernization" and "revamping" was criticized for not considering the broader aspects of modern technology and productivity improvements.

                            4. Compliance with the Project Import (Registration of Contract) Regulations, 1965:
                            The show cause notice alleged non-compliance with the requirement of an industrial license amendment showing permission for substantial expansion as per Section 13 of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951. The respondents argued that the modernization and revamping were approved by the Project Investment Board and endorsed as Project Imports by the Chief Controller of Imports and Exports. The Assistant Collector's rejection was based on a narrow interpretation, while the Appellate Collector's order was considered well-reasoned and judicious.

                            5. Relevance of Industrial Licence Amendment under Section 13 of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951:
                            The review notice focused on the lack of an industrial license amendment for substantial expansion. The respondents contended that substantial expansion should be interpreted as commonly understood, involving any modification that results in a significant increase in production. They provided evidence of substantial increases in production capacity and improved control systems. The Appellate Collector's order was upheld, as the conditions for registration were substantially fulfilled, and the Assistant Collector's denial of registration was found to be unjustified.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal upheld the order-in-appeal and discharged the review notice, dismissing the appeal. The Tribunal found that the conditions for registration under the Project Import (Registration of Contract) Regulations, 1965, were substantially fulfilled, and the Assistant Collector's rejection was not justified. The modernization and revamping of the Rourkela Steel Plant were deemed to constitute substantial expansion, warranting the concessional rate of duty under Heading 84.66 of C.T.A., 1975.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found