Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the fabricated radiator parts manufactured on job work basis were identifiable goods liable to central excise duty and whether they were entitled to exemption as parts of a motor vehicle radiator under the relevant notification.
Analysis: The fabrication process did not bring into existence an identifiable or distinct manufactured product. Even assuming that the process resulted in radiator parts, such parts were treated as eligible for exemption as parts of a radiator under Notification No. 99/71 dated 29-5-1971. The competing reliance on Notification No. 119/75 dated 30-4-1975 was not accepted as defeating the claimed exemption on the facts found.
Conclusion: The fabricated radiator parts were not treated as dutiable goods in the manner urged by the Department, and the exemption claim was accepted in favour of the assessee.