Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cancellation of sales tax concession granted to the petitioner on the ground that it was not duly registered by the relevant date and was therefore not a "unit in pipeline" under the Haryana General Sales Tax Rules, 1975, was sustainable.
Analysis: The concession had earlier been granted and was later withdrawn solely on the premise that the petitioner lacked the requisite registration with the Department of Industries by the cutoff date. The dispute turned on the correct meaning of registration for purposes of rule 28C(o) and on whether the filing and acknowledgement of the industrial memorandum with the Secretariat of Industrial Assistance could satisfy the eligibility requirement. In view of the stand reflected in the record and the material placed before the Court, the matter required reconsideration by the competent screening committee on a fuller examination of the relevant facts and the Central Government's position.
Conclusion: The impugned cancellation order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Higher Level Screening Committee for fresh in accordance with law.