Pre-deposit condition for hearing appeals set aside; scrap value dispute to be decided on merits without insistence.

The Bombay HC set aside the Tribunal's insistence on pre-deposit as a condition for entertaining appeals concerning inclusion of the value of scrap retained by the assessee in the assessable value for job work. Relying on an earlier decision on a similar issue, the Court held that the appeals should be heard on merits without insisting on pre-deposit. It accordingly directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the appeals in accordance with law without such condition.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in directing pre-deposit as a condition for entertaining the appeals.

Analysis: The appeals concerned a common order of the Tribunal insisting on pre-deposit in a dispute relating to inclusion of the value of scrap retained by the assessee in the assessable value for job work. A prior decision on a similar question had directed that the appeals be heard on merits without insisting on pre-deposit. Following that approach, the Court set aside the Tribunal's order and directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to hear the appeals in accordance with law without insisting on pre-deposit.

Conclusion: The direction to make pre-deposit was set aside and the appeals were to be heard on merits without such insistence.

---