Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether garter springs were correctly classifiable under Heading 84.01/02 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 350/76-Customs.
Analysis: The appellants claimed that the garter springs were components used in the manufacture of air-preheaters, which were themselves parts of boilers, and relied on a drawing, technical write-up, and affidavit of end use. The Department objected that the evidentiary material was insufficient because the drawing of the air-preheater was not produced. On the material available, the Tribunal found the evidence adequate to establish the claim made for classification and benefit of the notification.
Conclusion: The garter springs were held eligible for classification under Heading 84.01/02 and the appellants were entitled to the consequential relief claimed.