Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an electric pressure cooker is classifiable under Item 54 of the Central Excise Tariff as a pressure cooker.
Analysis: The electric element fitted inside the cooker was treated only as the means by which heat was generated, while the real heat source was the electric current supplied from outside. Since the current enters from an external source and heats the element for cooking, the objection that the cooker lacked an external heat source was rejected. On that basis, the goods answered the description of pressure cooker under the specific tariff item, and the alternative claims under other tariff entries did not require examination.
Conclusion: The electric pressure cooker was correctly classifiable under Item 54 of the Central Excise Tariff, and the appeal succeeded.