Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the censorship certificate length affixed to a cinematograph film formed part of the film for the purpose of levy of excise duty under Item No. 37 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.
Analysis: The scheme of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 and the Cinematograph (Censorship) Rules, 1958 shows that a completed film is submitted for certification and that the certificate is granted after examination of the film. The statutory provisions dealing with certification, marking and exhibition of certified films indicate that the trailer certificate is only the prescribed mark of certification and not an additional part of the film itself. Rule 36 merely requires the certificate to be affixed to and always exhibited with the film, which is a method of display of the certificate and does not transform it into part of the cinematograph film. In fiscal statutes, the meaning of goods must be gathered as understood in trade and commerce, and neither traders nor viewers would treat the censorship certificate length as a film or feature film.
Conclusion: The censorship certificate length of the film was not liable to excise duty under Item No. 37.
Ratio Decidendi: For excise classification, an attached statutory certificate remains a certificate and does not become part of the taxed goods where the statute and rules treat the underlying article as a completed product and the attachment as only a prescribed mode of certification.